Love Is Not a Metric Space

or, Why You Should Go to a Weird Party Instead

Eric Garcia

Love Is Not a Metric Space

I.The Setup

Love Is Not a Metric Space2

The promise, stated fairly

Enough attributes, enough people, good enough matching — and the right person is a query away.

Love Is Not a Metric Space3
Sam as a profile card and as a column of numbers
Love Is Not a Metric Space4
25 30 35 40 45 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 age humor: dark distance Sam (34, 0.7)
Love Is Not a Metric Space5
25 30 35 40 45 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 0 10 20 age humor: dark miles from family distance Sam (34, 0.7, 13)
Love Is Not a Metric Space6

Two ways to meet someone

Love Is Not a Metric Space7

The claim

Compatibility isn't a distance. The weight on every feature changes with the pair, so it doesn't add up across people the way a distance does.

Love Is Not a Metric Space8

II.One Ruler

Love Is Not a Metric Space9

Sam's first date

Ninety-seven percent.

Love Is Not a Metric Space10

The rebuttal

“Fine. Don't use a ruler off the shelf. Learn the metric — let the model learn the weights from who actually matched.”

Love Is Not a Metric Space11

What's true in it

Recommenders find compatibility every day. If you liked B, and B is like C, you'll like C. Granted — for films.

Love Is Not a Metric Space12

III.A Ruler per Pair

Love Is Not a Metric Space13

Sam's second date

Wrong on three of the questions the app weighted most. Right at the table.

Love Is Not a Metric Space14

The turn

There's no single metric to learn. The ruler is different on every line.

Love Is Not a Metric Space15
One ruler for everyone closes the triangle; per-pair weights do not
Love Is Not a Metric Space16

Why you can't learn your way around it

Love Is Not a Metric Space17

Compatibility doesn't triangulate, and no amount of data makes it.

Love Is Not a Metric Space18

IV.Master and Emissary

Love Is Not a Metric Space19
Iain McGilchrist, The Master and His Emissary, Yale University Press, 2009
Love Is Not a Metric Space20

The Master and His Emissary

Two modes of attention. One takes a thing apart and re-presents it. The other meets it whole.

— McGilchrist, 2009

Love Is Not a Metric Space21

What only exists whole

Love Is Not a Metric Space22

The weights were never in the column. So Sam was never in the column.

Love Is Not a Metric Space23

V.The Weird Party

Love Is Not a Metric Space24

What the apps did instead

The questionnaire lost. The swipe won: one photo, one thumb, one number about one person.

Love Is Not a Metric Space25
Everyone as a dot on a single desirability axis
Love Is Not a Metric Space26

A different way of knowing

The alternative isn't a better app. It's a different way of knowing.

Love Is Not a Metric Space27

The room versus the query

A room full of people who came for the same strange reason is a better-conditioned sample than any query.

Love Is Not a Metric Space28

“But I met my partner on an app”

The app was the bus stop. The room did the work.

Love Is Not a Metric Space29

The search was never the hard part. The apps solved search. Love was never a search problem.

Love Is Not a Metric Space30